If it helps, think of my posts as a way of amusing myself (playing Devil's advocate).
I think I've already said that I think there is enough evidence to raise suspicion at a 'probable cause' level to justify some sort of investigation (though perhaps not enough for an arrest).
But to prove criminal action in court, you have to meet a much higher standard of proof. I think that 'sloppy communication' (and things like it) might be sufficient to raise a sufficient degree of doubt.
If I were prosecuting this case, I'd need to know a LOT more than what has been presented by the harshest skeptic to have posted.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.