>Uh, penny, they supposedly have been in existence for fiftyyears. You don't think they would have decided?
Again, I'm mostly looking at hypothetical explanations.
I'm not arguing what I believe (for sure, or only
strongly suspect).
I don't disagree with this: that David Fairchild owes
his potential clients proof of existence of FH&AF,
being explicit about its organizational form (i.e.,
was it incorporated, or in existence in some other
legal non-incorporated form) and verifiable history.