InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 5291
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2007

Re: A deleted message

Monday, 01/28/2008 2:16:03 PM

Monday, January 28, 2008 2:16:03 PM

Post# of 114953
I'm not saying that I'm at all impressed with
the debut of www.fairchildholdings.com, but what
I don't know for a fact is this: whether they
were actually intending to pass themselves off
as a NY corporation and hoped that no one would
check (how likely is that, even for a scammer),
or that being registered in NY was just an option
that they changed their minds on, but they (like
MT and the original debut of the pdrexchange)
got sloppy and let go out the door web-content
that was obsolete [i.e. 'filler content' for
set-up purposes] that they had meant to replace
with what is there now (i.e., their info of
having offices in Panama).

Does it all look suspicious? Sure. But, again,
would it be proof that would stand up in court?
I have my doubts about that (based on what I
know today). However, would it surprise me if you
are 100% correct? No.

If they were indicted to stand trial today, the
prosecution would have to meet the 'beyond a
reasonable doubt' standard, which is pretty high.
I'd say that at best, today, there is only 'probable
cause' to look into the details.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.