It would seem that 'shareholder audits' could be quite lucrative and a natural addition to the services offered by stock promoters who work for the purported victim companies of height-challenged nudists.
But haven't US courts essentially ruled that companies have no standing to bring suit for short-selling abuses? Weren't the NUTK and GMXX lawsuits dismissed on that basis?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.