Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[mick]

hi sterling, ya know all appreciate your fine input plus updates.

so where i made a correction should i add this to the federal vs public company?

RE:
Jim6103, with that SRSR “Federal” observation…

Your thoughts are greatly appreciated on that matter. Here is the history as to why I thought what I posted was considered federal.

This was a post I made back on 7 Nov 07 when SRSR was at .0005 per share:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=24371701

That was a conversation I had with the Canadian Government officials at the Mines and Minerals Division for Ontario from the parent link below…
http://www.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndm/mines/default_e.asp

…that is used to get to the $4.7 Billion Niobium valuation confirmation link below:
http://www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/pub/data/imaging/S034/S034.pDf?expires=20080101121211&secretname=mndm&id=&ticket=d5aeaf78e186faddff1744e8f7b92535&f=d.exe
(See page 34 as what was mentioned in the PR.)

When I spoke to the Mines and Minerals Division for Ontario over the phone, I do recall that one of the things that the lady told me was that if it is mentioned within their website, consider it to be real and confirmed by the Canadian Government.

On the top of page 34 where it reads “GULF MINERALS CANADA LIMITED” is indicating that the info on that page was federally authenticated, but was done so by a private company.

I guess the most proper way of saying that would have been to say “federally authenticated” through the service of a private company called GULF MINERALS CANADA LIMITED as opposed to saying that GULF MINERALS CANADA LIMITED is a Federal company. Thanks for that correction.

v/r
Sterling