C'mon Matt you're much smarter than that.
Look at Rocky's post to me, which to use your word was "sewage."
jas244 did not delete that, as he doesn't for johnson, WillyWizard and his other buddies, so I simply responded in kind to Rocky's insulting remark about changing my meds. I did not initiate this kind of exchange, I simply responded to it.
If Pete is going to allow Rocky to make personal and insulting remarks, then what was I to infer but Peterson was going to tolerate remarks like the one's Rocky had been making.
What's fair for one is fair for all,Matt. And I say this given the history of prejudice of these folks towards me.
What I was really doing was responding to what I perceived to be the unfair toleration (by Pete) of remarks made by one of their friends, but when I responded in the same spirit of Rocky's remark it is somehow viewed as being out of bounds.
That IMO opinion is hypocritical.
I did not make the first attack, I just made a smart-alecky retort in the same fashion as Rocky like the one directed to me; where he says to me "blah blah blah...good luck.
So, I'm not interested in getting into personal attacks and if Pete were doing his job by deleting Rocky's remark, I certainly never would have said anything out of the blue that was negative toward Rocky.
Matt, you know enough about CVIA's history, and I know you know who I am. I was in this stock long before Keith, and I have been consistent for 8 years now in my goal to not let the bad guys win...and CVIA's current management are bad guys and most of my posts are directed toward what I said: "to provide a rational voice for the honest and long suffering investors to consider."
I hope this clarifies things for you and that you can find a way to let me return to providing that rational voice to this board.
Thanks, Matt, and congratulations on your success in making IHub a success.
