deeba: Re: ...are you saying that Brad & Coop & all the others from NVEI are flat out lying to their shareholders when they have repeatedly stated that the tech works?
In my opinion, they have been as truthful about the tech as they were about Brad "reducing" his salary from $250,000 to $268,000.
Or, as truthful as they were about Rich taking a "pay cut" when in actually, he requested to go part time so he could work on the new movie.
Or, as truthful as they were about having the FPGA completed by the end of 2002.
Or as truthful as they were about having the FPGA completed by the end of 2003.
Or as truthful as they were about the promise of no "going concern" statement in the 2002 annual report.
Or as truthful as they were about promising revenues from the tech in 2002.
Or as truthful as they were about promising revenues from the tech in 2003.
Or as truthful as they were about promising revenues from the tech in the first half of 2004.
Or as truthful as they were about the Intellicon merger.
Or as truthful as they were about the Hytek acquisition.
Or as truthful as they were about PowerStream being a viable, proven technology when they bought it in April of 2002.
Or as truthful as they were about the demise of Cu@OCx.
Or as truthful as they were about projections of $40,000,000 gross from the movie.
Or as truthful as they were about the Maine telco test on a "prototype" that was 80% based on a technology that by the company's own admission was not completed until nearly a year later.
Or as truthful as they were about the Lucent verification of the Cu@OCx technology, which later was proven not to work.
Or as truthful as they were about the so-called "prototype" device on display at the 2002 SHM.
Or as truthful as they were about the Mercatus loan.
Or as truthful as they were about Alberto Fernandes's contribution to the technology and his "presentation" at the symposium.
Or as truthful as they were about the reasons for securing Quint as a PR firm.
Or as truthful as they were about the reasons for securing Fleischman-Hillard as a PR firm.
Or as truthful as they were about the reasons for the reverse split.
Or as truthful as they were about the move to the "new research facility" in Pleasanton.
Or as truthful as they were about the $23 million financing deal from Beter.
Or as truthful as they were about the promise of an ASIC in 2003.
Or as truthful as they were about the promise of an ASIC in the first half of 2004.
Or as truthful as they were about "rolling thunder" the first time.
Or as truthful as they were about "rolling thunder" the second time.
Or as truthful as they were about "rolling thunder" the third time.
Or as truthful as they were about "delivering on the promise".
Or as truthful as they were about "underpromising and overdelivering".
Or as truthful as they were about releasing the movie in 2002.
Or as truthful as they were about releasing "white papers" and "datasheets" in 2002.
Or as truthful as they were about the name change to RIM.
Or as truthful as they were about executives "purchasing" stock with deferred salary and bonuses.
You get the picture.
AI
