InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 742
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2003

Re: KCMW post# 889

Wednesday, 12/19/2007 1:54:46 PM

Wednesday, December 19, 2007 1:54:46 PM

Post# of 1696
KCMW...I do agree with you on that ...I do not expect any APPL announcment with BRST mentioned....neither do I expect any further, significant business development between the two.

But I have to strongly disagree with you on the value of BRST...

The 31 cent is certainly not based on any DVR hopes but rather continues license agreement upcoming! Hence how it stands at the moment the 30+ cents are UNDERVALUED , significantly !!
Sure that the future infringement settlements will not be in the 100rd of millions as hoped for from APPL...but it will still have a significant future revenue hence dividend income!!
Once again...the patents are VALID...at this point of time ALL of them .... if we had gone to court we would have been battling for 22 non obvious patent claims (out of 36)!!! So I do not understand how you can put such a low value on such significant patent portfolio?
We have all already discussed the very disappointing 10$ million settlement , BUT its a mystery to me how people regard the (meager) settlement as a loss??
Did BRST lose in court?? NO
Did BRST pay APPL 10$ million ?? NO
Did APPL pay BRST 10$ million ?? YES
Did MSFT pay BRST 60$ million ?? YES