Evening... of note... as my rock turning continues...
I had a short but sweet talk with a fine lawyer firm this afternoon... the ones that were hired to stop the proceedings of last April... sorry there woog, I was right again.
This bunch were referred to me last week as far as something else I'm pursueing but after a few minutes I realized there just might be a conflict and so we ended up just having a friendly mid-western chat.
{b}Day-Edwards{/b]... you few folks with Schwabbie and Fidelity might remember their names, HELL... mainuh probably makes up half of Schwabs clients that have BCIT... LMAO!
So the ? arises... why would Schwabb go to the expense of hiring Day-Edwards (big league firm) to contest what The Brit had initiated in OKC back in April? because they were worried about the handful of clients that had BCIT? HARDLY... they could havebought them all new shares for what it cost to hire those lawyers!imo
Must be somethin' else huh? same goes for Fidelity, IMO of course.
So you see once again woog... your ego got the better of you.. you and the Fumbling Fourteen did'nt even make a blip!
It ain't over till we say it's over shell... "obviously"? he-he-he... prove your statement!
"And the sharks started to circle... the smell of blood in the water was overwhelming!"
