InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1107
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/10/2006

Re: walk post# 5235

Sunday, 12/16/2007 12:19:31 PM

Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:19:31 PM

Post# of 12660
Interesting line of thinking. What's the minimum conflict of interest, breach of accepted procedure, or actual illegality that needs to be demonstrated to produce an overturn of the FDA blocking decision? How could the committee elicit the required information?

How about if Pazdur merely leaked the letter to Cancer Letter? (The letter was poorly written, as you'll recall, and I'm guessing Scher is a sloppier thinker than Pazdur and thus the more likely author.) Presumably the couple who run CL could be subpoenaed to testify who gave them the letter.

Or what if Scher (or Maha) can be induced to squeal that Pazdur suggested Scher / Maha write and leak?

Could wotsisname, Jesse Goodman (?)head of CBER, be forced to explain what communications he received from Pazdur and von E between AC and the decision and what his own recommendation and rationale was?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.