InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1798
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/11/2007

Re: enemem post# 14550

Saturday, 12/15/2007 7:19:27 PM

Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:19:27 PM

Post# of 52004
Well Said. I agree wholeheartedly. It is amazing to me that even with the surfacing of "the letter", one of which I never thought we would see the likes of, we may still be completely subject to all out speculation. You might add that the prevalant information concealed in such a letter will now be in the hands of the person who choses to disclose all, any, or none of its contents based on what my be considered the consequential fallout for doing so...public scrutiny, SP descendence, whatever. I would have a hard time believing it could be so bad in content when recently Stoll so confidently claimed that we would be seeing an increased share price in the year to come. Maybe he was hoping one would never arise for fear of "Lucy you have some explaining to do". Then again he also stated, my interpretation, that the likes of IND rejection were nearly nill as well. Kay sa ra sa rah.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RSPI News