Essentially , Fishingincea , that was my point . The MM's have no pressing motivation to permit a run because they would have to use either lawfully borrowed shares or lawful NSS to entice buyers when there are very few sellers , since most ( if not all ) of the float is owned by the participants on this board . The MM's would consider the use of any borrowed or NSS shares too risky for them to make money , particularly if a run on COPI got out of THEIR control and they would have to buy back the borrowed or NS shares at higher valuations .
I think that COPI will need to engage in a vigorous news release campaign in early 2008 to generate broader interest in COPI stock so that new buyers will offer a FAIR price for COPI stock . When new buyers are prepared to pay .02 cents , then .04 cents , then .10 cents and higher , then current shareholders will be enticed to sell and the Market Makers will have their ' market ' for COPI without the risks of using borrowed or NS shares .
Simply , without Cornell / Y.A having shares to sell and with most of the current shareholders holding out for much higher share prices the MM's don't have liquidity to create their unique style of low-risk ( to them ) volatility .
2008 will change this stock to a must-have stock where new investors will feel SAFE that whatever price they pay for COPI shares will increase in value .
Compliance Systems is a growth company . Garfinkel wants COPI stock to be a GROWTH stock in direct proportion to his company's growth . At a lousy $1 million market cap he apparently sees the crippling effects of Cornell / Yorkville (ill)Advisors so he is dispatching them ASAP .
Wordy response to your simple question .....a woman's perogative , hahahaha .
To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .
