InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1896
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2007

Re: None

Thursday, 12/13/2007 11:43:18 PM

Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:43:18 PM

Post# of 115222
Well longs, I hope nobody here is surprised that some people here working hard at discrediting the reports; however, as I already knew, they have been working on their game plan for a few weeks now with all the different ways to attack. They are good at what they do and will find anything to distort. As far as I am concerned (note: I havent read much posts since after market close) we have the Russian version and the english version, so any translation error is not because AURUS is trying to get away with anything. Both reports are there. No way they can get away with it. As far as the wording "costs" in the geological report, that must be a transation error as the geological report's job is NOT to figure out the expenses/costs of the site, just the reserves that can be pulled out. The value of 3.9 billion in my opinion is the reserves. The 2.9 billion value by Arkadia in my opinion is the discounted version to put a price tag of the company. This has nothing to do with what net profit they can obtain, but just a price tag I believe to be used for buyout purposes. Just my opinion, now I will try to catch up with all the posts.