EyeCashNetworks Inc. (fka ECNI)

[jmhollen]

You have such an insulting way of framing most everything you sputter, that I wonder how often it is that someone knocks you flat on your snide-mouthed arse. That presumes, of course, that you have the balls to (a) leave the house, and (b) run your flapping hole the same way face-to-face that you do when hiding behind your CRT and bogus alias.

Chris Jensen may be competent, incompetent, a skilled corporate development person, or a complete dud. I don't know and I don't care. I don't own any ENCI and don't plant to. I started this Board to give the effort a clean place to start, since the sputterings and complaints on other boards belong to the bygone era where they are located.

If you and 'scion' can offer some written, independently confirmed proof that the technology won't work, or that ENCI efforts are not legitimate - do so. OBTW: Dried, yellowed and dog-eared filings and media spattered court filings don't count.....

I'd like to see either of you go there and operate their cash pad equipment. Or, buy your own and take it to an recognized electronics/software lab and get some data - in writing - that says the equipment is currently "..nonfunctional.." and that the transaction model won't work. So far all I've seen from you two is repetition of other people's opinions and after-the-fact finger-wagging based on non-technical peoples' problems with the SEC.

The model of the transaction technology worked exactly as it was described, when I saw it demonstrated. Models and/or simulations can obviously be "..kludged up.." to appear that they perform, but no one has ever shown that to have been the case - that I'm aware of. And, the inherent liability of pulling that kind of stunt, considering the nature of the financial community, would be a "..one trick pony.." sufficient to trash any company the moment it was discovered and reported.

The potential application and uses of the ePay and/or EyeCash-to-be technology were boundless in the marketplace during the Dot.Com Bubble era when it was being introduced. And, contrary to your claims, Harry Hargens said it was workable - prior to his meandering off into Oz.

The financial officers and management executives of web-based (..online ebusiness capable..) companies it was presented to we're interested-to-excited about the possibilities. When the Executive VP of a major online brokerage, or a huge electric utility firm, tells someone that he knows that is what they need and offers an invitation for the tech-heads to get together and work it out - it is exciting. Especially for people who spend their whole lives "..building America.." and making complex process systems work. (..as opposed to those who sit on their brains, shuffle last quarter's paper, and attempt to second-guess what happened after all the trains have left the station..)

It certainly will be nice to see the day when you and 'scion' can buck up the courage to use your real names - or sign your posts. But, nobody will be holding their breath...........

John