InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1305
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2007

Re: jerseyboy post# 39353

Saturday, 12/08/2007 4:53:55 PM

Saturday, December 08, 2007 4:53:55 PM

Post# of 87544
I think discussion about a r/s is pointless at this time.

In the interest of new members of this board who might be scared of such comments as "a r/s is inevetable" (ooh scary), I'll go on to discuss it anyway...

First, Paul has a history of taking care of shareholders and would likely only r/s for our benefit. I do not think he will r/s and dilute later (every penny holders worst fear). Spooz has major partners on board, has revenues from 141, and will have STv2 revenues coming soon. I say, no more need for dilution. Paul indicated they'll need money for the launch/marketing, but my guess is that will be borrowed and paid back within a short period.

Uplisting later to Nasdaq for instance might merit a reverse split at some point, but not anytime soon in my opinion. Based on the CONSERVATIVE revenue projections from the company, an r/s would likely be required for uplisting to Nasdaq anytime in the next three years.

However, if Spooztoolz catches on like some professional traders think it will (see Fedfunz posts), we may all be surprised at how fast revenues grow.

Any analysis of this issue is speculative at best, so let's just focus on the real issues at hand for the time being- the launch, the marketing, the 141 startup, the new offices, etc.

No point debating a scenario that none of us have enough dd to support.

Hope everyone's having a good weekend.

Peace,
gbathat

God grant me the serenity to deal with the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can and should; and wisdom to know the difference.