InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 4127
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/06/2003

Re: KeithDust2000 post# 27774

Monday, 03/01/2004 12:02:18 PM

Monday, March 01, 2004 12:02:18 PM

Post# of 97836
Keith, yes, but Paul said 'functional' 90nm. :) I don't know how he defines functional, but I would consider a process shrink to be functional when it brings a clear advantage over the previous generation. To me, that means some combination of higher clock rate, lower power and lower cost.

Intel's 90nm seems pretty disfunctional at this time.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News