Oh my the sky is falling--
The CEO has laid out groundwork for funding venture(s) and the minimum wage bashers are out and proclaiming 'dilution, dilution, dilution.' This has as much ability to run as any pinkie but if you are a true long why do we care if it runs or not. hypster is the anchor property here and it's growing at a nice clip. The CEO is working toward multiple streams of income and this company is going to be solvent for at least 1 year.
Need I say that the biggest hurdle for startup enterprises is running out of money. It seems the CEO is not wanting to experience such a situation. The most promising concept or brand or service needs a certain amount of funding. Who here wouldn't spend a million to make 2-10 million more?
What I'm curious about is what PR or speculation is going to bring in a new base of holders to buy at .0003 + I mean if you are a true long why should you care about buying a bunch at ask through .0001-.0005 if you believe that this has ETIM type of potential(now in pennies) as mentioned by Matt earlier? I sincerely hope that those who are on sidelines waiting for more cheap shares .0001-.0002 don't lose their opportunity to increase their position. Inevitably, when the larger FB audience starts coming in the tent--a number of these may want a literal piece BUNM action.
Finally, I hope that all posters stop relaying any/all of their personal information from the CEO. It cannot be substantiated and it can actually defeat substantive runs here because so many sell on 'news' whereas people truly to tend to buy on speculation.
The MMs are winning hearts and minds here by trying to portray this at very diluted and saying it never runs. Let CEO do his job which should be building maximum value for all involved here--not doing individual PRs. IMO We have had so many unofficial 'PRs' here that it may be depressing demand.
All that is here is a psychological wall of frankly too much realism coupled with the usual conservatism. The CEO growth numbers are indeed highly conservative and are very calculated to that end. IMO the CEO believes this to have much greater promise and wants to exceed the markets expectations. 5 billion is a reasonable share structure--I am supportive of this blueprint as long as the scale makes sense. If this runs out of money we're all simply dead $$$- or else we are left to an R/S or an endless stream of toxic financing schemes.
I personally want this to run to have an option of 'free-shares' but also because it's a natural way to grow a healthier base. MMs are not totally to blame for runs not going anywhere, demand must be strong and people should not reveal upcoming 'news' because that is a momentum killer. Let the majority keep guessing because then they will have to chase the price rather than 'wait for their right price.' This builds the base--Let's focus on letting this thing unfold and see what full FB rollout is going to do to growth numbers. I do believe this has a potential for exponential growth and the company has to be ready for any/all contingencies.
