Instead of always hiding behind childish name calling, point out where I'm wrong...
-Was it The Wall Street Journal's article discussing how the U.S. Navy is now building a a military installation atop a petroleum-export platform in Iraq?
-Was it the admin keeping secret ("confidential") the names of energy execs/corps who met with the Veep shortly before we invaded Iraq?
-Was it the excuse this admin used for a troop "surge", and how 10mos later we see it hasn't made any difference in how the Iragi gov't does business - and why should it, as long as Americans are willing to sacrifice their blood and fork over billions $$$, why change ANYTHING?
Point out which is wrong...Can you handle that challenge without resorting to childish behavior?
"If we talk about the economy, we'll lose"
-Bush44's top aide
"This campaign is not about issues"
-Rick Davis, Bush44's Campaign Manager