InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 177
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/02/2007

Re: traderpirate44 post# 28762

Tuesday, 11/20/2007 4:25:53 PM

Tuesday, November 20, 2007 4:25:53 PM

Post# of 38879
traderpirate44, Rehash of 2006 is getting boring.

If you took the time to look around you would realize there are still a few longs in this stock. Therefore your words do NOT qualify as truthful. Most of the Newbies here are in at $1.00 (.0002),...... and $2.00 (.0004) looks good to them. They did not experience the gloom and doom of MGMX, and frankly your rehash from early 2006 is falling on deaf ears. As far as US NON-EXISTING LONGS are concerned, any sustained movement upward is greatfully appreciated.

Lastly, what qualifies a person to be a "SHORT" or a "LONG"? If a person sells stock without owning any shares, he is immediately called a "SHORT". If a person has been around for a year or more with shares in this stock, he or she is called a "LONG", but is that the true meaning of LONG. A person who invests heavily in this stock would most probably be the best definition of a "LONG". I consider myself a "LONG" and I'm sure Mary considers herself a "LONG". So, let's not make assumptions that the "LONGS" are long gone.

Sam, 10,200 BWNR (51,000,000 MGMX).