InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252638
Next 10
Followers 0
Posts 26
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/18/2006

Re: rancherho post# 55004

Tuesday, 11/20/2007 2:11:18 AM

Tuesday, November 20, 2007 2:11:18 AM

Post# of 252638
Thanks, Wall and Ranch. I had yet another look a the KM curve for the docetaxel treated population, and i wondered if - based on the observation that size of the steps down on the KM curve - it is so that more or less all of the docetaxel treatments were very close to the provenge treatment (close after Provenge treatment, as Dr. Petrylak mentioned that most docetaxel treatments took place after Provenge)?

A scarry thought came to my mind after reading Ranch's comment about the split of median survival improvement between docetaxel treated provenge patients and provenge-only treated patients. Could the FDA argue that the ITT population only had a survival benefit if also treated with docetaxel, and since such a treatment regime was not prespecified, sorry DNDN (and longs), any conclusions based on D9902B are just 'exploratory' (or whatever word is used)...?

And final question (for now): In the BLA appendix, it appears that the D9902B patients had a higher lower limit for CD54 cells than was the case for D9901 and D9902A - is this relevant as a predictor for the number of TNC?

Again, as usual, thanks for taking your time to answer my previous questions and TIA for the answers/comments I hope to get to the questions listed above.

B.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.