As I read many of these posts--I feel better about my investment in this because of an emergence of those who seem to underestimate the value that is already here and also a much greater upside that will be coming. Moreover, I relish the arrival of anything that remotely constitutes as 'bashing' because it beckons great volatility ahead and also attempts by certain parties to keep PPS down. Relatively speaking, we are now talking still about the infancy of a company and a brand name. It is really just getting started and yet a number of posters here think that it's all going to be overnight. As for supposed cry of 'dilution' it seems current share structure left open a door for CEO to presumably grow the business model. Would certain posters here prefer the 'toxic financing' be engaged which would suck the life out of this before it ever truly begins?! The CEO has a vested interest in BUNM and it's called millions and not dollars. I do not give blind trust to any CEO because I have seen numerous examples of massive dilution, massive salaries and no real prospects for success. Rewards should come after success and not before. Bulk of monies from stock sales should be put into profitable use--in this case preparing an infrastructure for sustainable or even exponential growth. I do not know Michael personally, however I will give him a benefit of doubt based on competent performance and also because I believe it in his interest to attain a total success for this endeavor. Based on some research, I think bigger players are unwilling to gamble on losing out to 'the next big thing.' Repeated Web traffic and the consumer loyalty are worth millions and Wall Street and others are taking watch. For anyone who cares--my analysis of BUNM is currently--limited 'dilution,' conservative CEO floating off equity and huge upside for success with multiple possible income streams about to come on-line. This engine is just getting started. CEO is not overly concerned nor does he have universal remote control over the PPS! He has enough on his plate in getting profitability and moving to a bigger stage. If my analysis changes because of situation then I am free to sell into a run or get out for a loss etc or buy more. I would hope that posters understand that 'dilution' does not mean disease. 'Dilution' on a limited and intelligent basis can be a sound and not 'fatal' approach. Anyone who is acquainted with micro-penny stocks will know that the so-called 'dilution' of present is comparatively speaking nada. There are stocks with 15 billion maxed out O/S that have moved .0010 + daily on nothing but speculation and have no real potential or revenue streams of any real consequence. The paper-wall at .0005 is not going to last forever and it will be exciting when this runs for real.
