InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 168
Posts 13710
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/27/2007

Re: Traderfan post# 37691

Tuesday, 11/13/2007 6:09:34 PM

Tuesday, November 13, 2007 6:09:34 PM

Post# of 85632
Your right. I am more than willing to talk about anything that is factual about the company. But that's not what has been going on here. Some love to throw out any kind of information true or mostly false and justify their sentiments towards SPZI based on this information.

So when we get information that is known to be false, ie. the relationship between Omniquaint and Spooz, why not verify? No folks don't call the company. They continue to state there is no need to verify. Now the excuse not to call the company to verify is what you say is unimportant.

Funny how this debate was NOT unimportant 3 days ago. That my friend, is the very nature of FUD. Let's mix in a little truth but really focus on the untrue. Until someone can verify the info the FUD can roam freely. Again the very nature of FUD is to do this type of debating.

If we are to debate SPZI let us talk on an even playing field. So my question can turn back to you my friend. Why not play on an even playing field. When a new topic comes up, why not get the info ASAP? Why is it debatable and of utmost importance one day and just a footnote the next? Why all the hesitation to call the company for verification?

If something is really horrible going on with Spooz, I would love to know. I'd be first in line to sell. But that's not what is happening is it?

Just wondering,

Boca_Bobby

Boca_Bobby

Mom said there would be days like this!