It's curious that you chose to lay the blame for the condition of this country at the doorstep of WJC, a guy BTW who hasn't been president for 7yrs, but don't give guy who occupies the oval office NOW for the mess we're in - including his invasion/occupation a country who did NOTHING to the USA, and his drunken-sailor spending habits. Very curious indeed.
As far as "widening the gap between the far left and far right citizenry", I submit my paragraph above and I trust you recognize that you have chosen to be part of a polarized citizenry.
Just curious, can you clarify..."...the Clinton's taking and trashing of the White House" - I didn't vote for the guy; my question is merely a curious one.
When you look back, wouldn't you agree Clinton's two terms in office, years of fiscal responsibility, were far more "conservative" than the fake conservative we have in the oval office today...of course, to answer that you will have to set aside (R) and (D) labels first. Can you do that?
As for Ron Paul not standing a chance of being elected president, I agree with you. He has stirred interest and apparently is raising money at an impressive rate, but his message of turning the country backwards will not resonate with a majority of voters.
"If we talk about the economy, we'll lose"
-Bush44's top aide
"This campaign is not about issues"
-Rick Davis, Bush44's Campaign Manager
