InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1798
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/11/2007

Re: Aiming4 post# 13335

Friday, 11/09/2007 12:40:12 AM

Friday, November 09, 2007 12:40:12 AM

Post# of 47635
Aiming,
I'm past the whole issue, but I am just saying that if Stoll had been given a reason from the FDA on Oct 11th then why has he not been more forthcoming regarding the reasoning?

If he didn't withdraw the IND then he most certainly, as you have said, asked and received a reasonable response via phone or whatever to justify the rejection. I doubt the FDA said "your IND was not accepted, we will send you a letter as to why", and Stoll said "ok thanks it was worth a try".

I am certainly not trying to rehash all this, it would just be nice to know the exact reason as to our current situation. If Stoll was so eager to move on then it just seems he knew the possiblity was there for FDA rejection due to an artifact or whatever. That indicates dishonest behavior for he did exclaim at the CC to inform the post mortem conclusion that the compound was clean and there should be no problems that he had foreseen to aquire FDA approval.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RSPI News