InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 265
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/05/2007

Re: JJ123abc post# 16814

Wednesday, 11/07/2007 1:06:06 PM

Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:06:06 PM

Post# of 29782
More Information for you on shorting.


http://www.investors.com/intelligence/bi04.asp

http://www.wall-street.com/nakedshorting.html



Below are extremely truncated excerpts from a very interesting conversation posted on a discussion board. An investor decided to experiment by trying to buy a shorted stock from 2 different sources. Here's what happened. Read the whole exchange for many more details.

Dennis Smith Posted: "I thought it might be interesting to prove a short position first hand by purchasing shares in (GLKC) a company that reportedly already had over 100% of it's shares sold (and "legally" documented).... Just after settlement date (three days later), I requested certificates from both brokers. The cert ordered through Ameritrade appeared in three weeks....

Getting the Wells Fargo cert however has become predictably (and almost amusingly) problematic....":

From Wells Fargo: ...We are researching your request and will contact you directly as soon as we have completed our investigation....

From Dennis Smith: ...It's been five days. What kind of "investigation" are you doing?

From Wells Fargo: ... We were awaiting full delivery of the shares from the transfer agent. Unfortunately, due to some unusual circumstances, this took longer than we expected.

From Dennis Smith: What exactly are the "unusual circumstances"?

From Wells Fargo: ...The broker/dealer from whom your shares were purchased is short 5,000,000 shares versus the street. A broker/dealer is allowed to sell shares which they do not own, which they will buy at a later date and deliver.

From Dennis Smith: Exactly how later is "later"? Is not a 5,000,000 short position cause for alarm? Who is the subject "broker/dealer" from whom you acquired my "shares" and what is that dealer telling you about his apparent failure to deliver? As I understand it, a shareholder is entitled to physical certificates in every event, assuming the buy was legitimate.

From Wells Fargo: ...The other broker/dealer who is short shares of your security is E*Trade. Though this type of activity makes it difficult to issue physical certificates, it is legal and within regulations. There is no definite date by which E*Trade would have to purchase the shares.... According to our trading desk, E*Trade was the only broker/dealer offering shares of GLKC yesterday. This has been the case since you originally requested your certificate.

From Dennis Smith: You stated there is no definite date by which E-Trade has to purchase the "short" shares that they sold you and that in turn you sold me. How can this be "legal"? What is to prevent them from continuing to sell what they don't own while subsequently refusing to buy the shares back if there are no time constraints?...

My bottom line is this. I demand the physical GLKC certificate(s) representing the shares I purchased.

From Wells Fargo: ...We have received your request for physical certificates. As soon as we are able to order a physical certificate for you, we will do so.
This article is sponsored by
the Exceptional Growth Companies at
Wall-Street.com
and by
the Microcap Leaders at
MicrocapLeaders.com




jock

CAUTION . Invest at your own risk. Never buy or sell based on opinions of posters.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.