Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[seabass]

>>>Lemme connect the dots as you seem unable to<<<


If you're as smart as you think you are, why can't you produce a response without telling others how stupid you think they are? Go back and check your own record. I bet 90% of replies include calling the recipient an idiot or similar.


>>>The White House PRess corps is over 90 % democratic ( by voter registration )<<<


You keep harping on the reporters party affiliation but ignore the effect it's having. Have you watched those press briefings the past 7 years? Especially leading up to the 2004 election I can't imagine an honest objective observer would have pegged 90% of those reporters as liberals. Even worse leading up to the war. Many of those reporters have admitted they were more concerned about access than asking tough questions.


>>>IF you really think the NYT doesn't have a liberal bias you really are hopeless<<<


Weird how there are no variables in your reasoning. Everything is either or.........PERIOD. (Is it ever partly cloudy where you live?).

I point out that the NYT was instrumental to Bush in selling the Iraq war and the only conclusion you can draw from that is that I think the NYT doesn't have a liberal slant. Of course they do, but that hasn't stopped them from being extremely helpful to the most radical rightwing administration in US history.

Who cares if they squawk about welfare, national healthcare and abortion rights as long as they promote a war that was a republican reelection guarantee in 2004 and a permit to print money for their contributors for the past 4 years. And ........you think the current supreme court would look as it does if the Iraq war never happened? That alone will pay off for conservatives for decades. But you'll never concede any of this because 90% of journalists are registered democrats so naturally they'll hurt conservatives.

I won't call you an idiot but I will call your thought process primitive.