InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1604
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/23/2006

Re: A deleted message

Friday, 11/02/2007 10:36:46 AM

Friday, November 02, 2007 10:36:46 AM

Post# of 44848
NYBob,

I don't think anyone is disputing that the tailings pile is on their claims. That is not the issue. The DD that I have done suggests the Maynard Topaz Mine is located hundreds of miles from the Rage claims. If that is the case, then RSDS does not have a mine, specifically the Maynard Topaz Mine, located on their claims. That is what I am getting at.

The ore that they are speaking of is the tailings pile shown in pictures here:

http://www.ru308.com/photos_2007_09_17.asp

The tailings pile was found near an abandoned mine that is from the 1960's. I am all for that, however, I don't think that it can be the Maynard Topaz Mine because documentation exists indicating that the Maynard mines in is not in San Juan county. If this mine has another name, great, I am all for it.

In the end, my whole argument is centered around the fact that RSDS did nothing to "EARN" this tailing pile, abandoned mine, revenue. It was all happened on by chance, which I have no problem with other than it does not give any indication tot he future direction of the company.

-faz






"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine." - John Galt