Monday, October 29, 2007 11:47:44 PM
Basically, if I could buy a share for less than market I would immediately sell it and take a profit. That will drive down the price.
However I was just thinking that there would likely be a clause whereby the buyers could not sell for a certain time period (say a year) in order to prevent that. So maybe I am wrong. Time Value of Money would still kick in... 5% or so a year?
however, I must say that in watching stocks in general for most of 4 years now, that is the pattern I have seen. Got to go with what you observe.
Example: MSF Medcomsoft (TSX). Warrants were exercised in mid-August at .65. Stock plummeted from .70 to .50 for no reason. Excellent growth and numbers. Almost profitable.
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM