InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 99
Posts 2761
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/10/2004

Re: Katfish post# 117

Wednesday, 02/18/2004 2:55:44 PM

Wednesday, February 18, 2004 2:55:44 PM

Post# of 27527
There was good reason no one wanted EKCS. My hunch the USAF "backlog" would begin to materialize was dead wrong.

I'm a little aggrivated to learn that they were counting "proposals" as backlog. I made the assumption "backlog" refered to "task orders awards". It's a little misleading to call proposals "backlog". My old company never did this...nor have I seen any other company refer to their proposal bank as "backlog". Unless those are "sole-source proposals", there's no way they should be refering to them as "backlog".

I'm still holding from $1.50 and will be calling to see if these are even "sole-source" proposals or if they're competitive proposals. EKCS looks like a very cheap security play now...but I'm starting to understand why.

"Our houses are such unwieldy property that we are often imprisoned rather than housed in them." - Henry David Thoreau, Walden: Economy, 1854

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.