InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 14155
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/04/2005

Re: KCMW post# 432

Friday, 10/26/2007 10:07:07 AM

Friday, October 26, 2007 10:07:07 AM

Post# of 1696
The case lies in the fact that the patent were innovative and non-obvious. In fact, Burst's technology is revolutionary. It was NOT obvious back in the 90's when it was created.That is the patent is ALL ABOUT;

here's a video showing that Burst' techno was NOT obvious during that time;

http://www.streamingmedia.com/east99/day2_track4.asp

Apple is using burst's technology without having a license.

They negotiated for months buy were enable to find a common ground. That tells u that Apple knows they are wrong..they just don't want to pay the price just yet.