doggone,
I always enjoy your prescence on the boards, but honestly, I think that you're over-reacting a little bit. I'm writing because I'm confused as to your reaction to the words "by the end of the calendar year". This is 2007, is it not? And the end of the calendar year would be December 31, 2007. To the best of my memory, we have been told that revenues would be coming in this year (2007), which would be "by the end of the calendar year." Where's the problem?
And if there are going to be revenues by the end of the year, or put another way, by the end of the calendar year....then wouldn't simple logic HAVE to decree that the equipment would have to be assembled? It has to be assembled to produce. I just don't see where not having a PR about it is that big a deal. Beebe probably didn't even think about it because he probably assumed that we would know that assembly would be a given.
I'm sure that you are very well-versed in contracts, but a PR is not a contract. Am I making any sense? I don't want to offend you when I say that you're over-reacting...but can you see where it is possible to not get that uptight about it? At any rate, this post probably won't change your mind...but at least it was worth a try. Thanks for listening.
