InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 683
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/09/2003

Re: frogdreaming post# 72043

Wednesday, 10/24/2007 1:03:39 PM

Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:03:39 PM

Post# of 82595
Same diatribe. All negative, which gives the motive away.

It would be nice to see an example of a court case where the "infringing" drugmaker
lost when their drug was twice as effective. You will also need to prove that every molecule that has a patent on it is basically owned.
"Yes, your honor, PT401 is twice as efficient and effective, and may very well save lives, but Amgen's patent says science cannot improve human lives".

Thank you for confirming what I said. The process of bringing PT-401 is ongoing, and there is no value placed on it yet.

And.."at this rate it will never be completed, just like every....blah...blah."