Followers | 39 |
Posts | 2870 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 12/06/2003 |
Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:21:45 PM
>>I don't like the way DNAWitness is worded on the Lynn Peavey web site.
Makes it sound like you have to have a suspect first to determine his/her ancestry.
It would be better if it read something like, "determine ancestral characteristics from an anonymous DNA sample"<<
This is copied from the Lynn Peavey listing:
>>The DNAWitness Collection Kit makes presumptive DNA testing for biogeographical ancestry a breeze! Find out what ancestry your suspect is<<
Do you notice the confused syntax in both cases? Would not a forensic scientist simply describe determination of racial profile of a suspect rather than "what ancestry your suspect is?"
There is an obvious attempt to work around a sensitive subject IMO.
Best, Terry
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM