InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 2049
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/13/2007

Re: kacey post# 271331

Sunday, 10/21/2007 3:39:34 PM

Sunday, October 21, 2007 3:39:34 PM

Post# of 279080
kacey, exactly right. And I posted numerous times regarding Cinemax being offshore. I was flamed and chided for bringing-up the fact that Pappy and the scammers were out of US jurisdiction and US laws do not apply to them. I also raised the concern that Cinemax Canada's presence in the US was a drop mail box in California. This US presence, I opined, was to evade SEC CROSS BORDER TRANSACTION DISCLOSURE via mandatory filing of ANTI-FRAUD & BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP filings with the SEC. Non-reporting companies are not exempt. I raised the issue that there legally could not be more than 10% US ownership of stock to meet SEC requirements in a cross-border merger. Gouveia disclosed Fan has 53% + they issued 100 million new shares, 25 million being serial preferred w/ undisclosed multiples. I opined that this was why a merger was not possible. The WA Secretary of State confirms no "merger". Instead, Cinemax Canada ACQUIRED the Cinemax WA/TMM public vehicle and TMM/Cinemax WA went private.
If Obion Group's 250 billion shares were added to the mix, how do they hide that from the SEC? Obion Group is a US entity. That, IMO, may be just one of the reasons why Obion Group got the boot.
My opinion is the scammers orchestrated a SPAC deal, like the SLJB/Sulja scam, and are playing both sides of fence. On one side, they evaded SEC CROSS BORDER ANTI-FRAUD & BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP disclosure by having the drop-box as their "US" presense AND, they evade US law by being incorporated in Canada.

Your DD is, as usual, stellar. ;0)





Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.