I find your posts very offensive. They state unequivicolly a stataement, like it is a fact, and yet you have no reason, logic, or proof that it is truly a fact.
Here is the one I am talking about ...
<<he is still diluting shares there will be no company share buy back damn wilf tell the truth for a change and stop deceiving investors with all your garbage>>
He IS still selling shares (Emphasis mine). YOur words. That is a bold statment my friend. Considering that the outstanding was at 499MM and the authorized is 500MM, where is he GETTING shares to "sell". Yet, you say flat out that he IS selling them.
You are accusing him of securities fraud. Plain and simple. You also call him a liar and deceiver. These statments are ACTIONABLE, and I think that at some point he might decide that you are libeling him. It has happened before. People saying things too often on an internet site have been cited for libel or manipulation of their own. Companies are going after people that are bashing them and stating things as fact that are not fact.
You say he is still selling shares, in spite of hitting the legal limit. PLease tell me where your proof comes from. If you accuse a man of illegal activity, at least try to show SOME proof of your claim. Otherwise, ... well that where the libel comes in!
So, please tell me 1) HOw he is doing it, since they are at the legal limit of what they can sell, and 2) How YOU can possibly KNOW this for a FACT. Do you have insider information? Surely you are not Wilf's BUDDY, with your thoughts of him. Has he confided in you something tha the rest of the world does not know? Would he? Or are you stating a thought that makes no logical sense, since he is at the limit, and no legal sense, since you are libeling a public figure on a public board with nothing to gain from the statment made?
If you can prove that he is still selling, and pushing us over our authorized limit, or that he held a covert shareholders meeting and changed the authorization level, then show it to us. Otherwise ... just shut up!
<<Is it that hard to tell the truth?>> Apparantly he is not eh only one with this problem. YOU say he IS selling shares. Share with me how this is ANYTHIGN other than a lie. Please. Otherwise, why would I want to listen to someone who is a PROVEN liar when he calls a second party a liar? WHo is deceiving the investors? YOU are, since youa re saying something that is "not true" (ANother way to say a LIE).
WIlf is not selling more shares, as the limit has been reached. Show me otherwise, or stop saying he is.
Credibility is earned. Do you thkk YOU have any when you write easily proven lies? Show me the proof, or just shut up and move on!
Okay?
AI
