InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 2039
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/23/2003

Re: Skylanders post# 13865

Tuesday, 10/16/2007 10:11:40 AM

Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:11:40 AM

Post# of 78704
I'm wondering what the "really" comment is about regarding this part of the post?

"Then we have this?? look at a company with no revenues, no real assets, no cash in the company, and having the current price and share structure, and on top of it all, Clayton as ceo. — Really... "

Is this simply a response because you have nothing to refute this part of the post? Because I would say that this part of the post IS the important part, and is very relevant.

Or were you agreeing with it, by saying "really?" I found it a little humorous in the responses to my article on gold mining companies when people were theorizing about how Drake was going to do business (since they really can only HAVE theories as there IS no business to speak of to date), and then the person says that they might do some of the mining themselves. I thnk that pretty much says a lot about the theories about how this company will "take off." Nothing wrong with hope, but let's stick to reality for the credibility factor - if anyone cares about that here. Some do...some clearly don't.

Some interesting discussions going on here - I do salute those currently moderating for allowing the give and take - it helps everyone in the long run, if this is a real company. If nothing else, it gives Clayton fodder for creating his next update - addressing real problems with time to come up with creative "answers."

I think my favorite recent post was the comment about the share price not being .005 (when it was at .006 or so) in defending what the company can pull off in the future. No doubt, that milli-penny will help...lol.