InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 205
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/20/2006

Re: None

Monday, 10/15/2007 1:24:47 AM

Monday, October 15, 2007 1:24:47 AM

Post# of 37776
Faster,

IMO it seems that he is suggesting that your notice about dilution is some how stating that he committed a felony..lol.  I am not an attorney but you should consider being more clear with something like this...

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BEFORE BUYING IPEI STOCK!!!
THERE IS A HISTORY OF DILUTION  AND DECLINING PPS.

- YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!

instead of..

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BEFORE BUYING IPEI STOCK!!!
HISTORY INDICATES THAT THIS IS JUST A MONEY GRAB FOR KEN EADE AND HIS FRIENDS.
HE WILL CONTINUE TO USE THE STOCK AS HIS OWN PERSONAL PIGGY BANK.
IF YOU BUY IPEI, BE PREPARED TO LOSE MOST OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

- YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!


IMO there is a clear history  of dilution and falling pps.  The chart is simply that.. a chart.. the skull and cross bones and caution makes reference to the dilution and falling PPS.  

As far as the links posted.. I don't see how that can be an issue as the following things have been posted:

-His bar record.. if he doesn't like it he can sue the bar of California

-The Dr. letter which was filed as evidence in the Hergott case.. if he doesn't like the letter he should sue the Federal court where this would be considered public record

-The PPM prospectus posted by another shareholder sent out by Ken himself.. so he should sue himself

-The email he sent to Cindy that she posted... and he confirmed to me by email that he did say..

-The links to the lawsuits.. which he should sue the superior court of California if he doesn't like this information... it has simply been reposted..

-The allegations made by Hergott in his lawsuit.. again Ken can sue the federal court about this if he doesn't like it..

-The emails reposted by shareholders that Ken wrote to them.. he has never disputed sending these and should sue himself for sending them..

-His wife is the lead of NS.. SIIR .. Autograph.. etc  etc... there is a link posted  from Raging Bull that is someone elses post.. he is welcome to sue raging bull about this.. but it looks like it is someone's opinion.. the link has been reposted...none of us wrote it

-The emails to me.. if he doesn't like what he wrote me.. he should sue himself...

-The article in forbes.. if he doesn't like it.. he can sue forbes...

If you remove any ambiguity that you are referring to drop in PPS and dilution then I don't see how these links can be something that he can sue over..but again I am not an attorney.. If I were you I would clarify because it looks like he is looking for people to point fingers at for his own problems...all just my opinion of course..  Don't give this bum any excuse to try and blame anyone else..  if we are the bigger people then he can be the only one to blame for his short comings...

If he does sue for slander than a defence is the truth.. so ask him under oath about his investrystallone posts and then subpenna those records.. if he did use that alias then he would have to admit to it and that he lied to me and other investors about it.. which then could be taken to the SEC .... or he would lie about it and if you can prove otherwise then it is purgery...  he claims he does not read the boards.. and he clearly does..