extra, you wrote:
In fact, he should re-post them, just to make sure that his "credibility is on track"
There are a couple of things for you to know here:
- I do not inherit my credibility from anyone. I personally do not care if you see me as credible or not and you better keep your judgment to yourself. This talk could be better directed to someone who could be shaken by such statement but with me you better save your effort, it's useless.
- I do not care to "make sure" of anything. This is the deal, this is me how I am, take it or leave it, and better leave it.
- I'm not waiting or wanting or needing to be judged by anyone and personally I do not care.
- Even if I had such info, I have the right to choose to disclose it or not. I'm not obliged to do anything so a correction for you, there's nothing I "should" do. In life, some are fortunate than others in many aspects and access to information is one of these aspects, live with it. Again, this is if the information you claim is true. In stock trading, some parties in higher market tiers receive news long before others and they use it to make a lot of money way before retail traders like you know or could react. This is an advantage for them. What could you do about this?
You wrote:
Your "credibility is on track" ONLY IF, you authorize g/h to publicly re-post all of those secret insider PMS's , that you already publicly distributed over the public internet, but only to him (so far) by trying to hide them as PM's.
and this in a comment on Gail's statement "i did not divulge any personal info and ill assume you will do the same for me".
The keyword here is "personal". If you can not tell the difference between personal information and stock-related information then this is another problem.
Posted by: extra
In reply to: only1gail who wrote msg# 47853
Date:10/12/2007 5:06:09 PM
gail; What about your belief in "Bozow's Rule" that states:
" If any information is ever sent anywhere through the Internet, including eMails, and PMs, then it is totally public, and neither Insider Info (IO), nor Private Meaningless Secrets (PMS). "
So, when you attempt to interrupt the free flow of public information, by saying :
" i did not divulge any personal info and ill assume you will do the same for me "
You are calling Bozow a liar, and accusing him of selectively spreading little secret bits of Insider Info.
Your "credibility is on track" ONLY IF, you authorize g/h to publicly re-post all of those secret insider PMS's , that you already publicly distributed over the public internet, but only to him (so far) by trying to hide them as PM's.
In fact, he should re-post them, just to make sure that his "credibility is on track" , even if only half of the two
off-trackers agree.
That's the "One-Track Rule" , or, "Mono-Rail Rule" , which is the foundation of all rumors and gossip, (sometimes known as free speech), and Guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Without that Rule, life would be boring, and our Rights to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" would be violated.
Your money, your decisions.
AI
