InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 386
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/09/2007

Re: harr449 post# 3791

Friday, 10/12/2007 4:06:38 PM

Friday, October 12, 2007 4:06:38 PM

Post# of 20865
Who is your reliable source ? Of course directors wouldn't have known about shareholder meeting all it took was the three shareholders who hold the majority of the stock.

Since the directors were removed by the meeting they did not need to be informed.

Apparently, they were removed because they refused to resign after attempting to take over the company illegally.

Did you read the 8k from the 19th. Trombly and Crane issued themselves 1.375 Billion shares apiece - there were only 1 Billion out in total prior to that.

They gave themselves 2/3 rds of the company. Thats why Bains name wasnt on the document. They excluded him to try to give themselves control of the company illegally.

Thank goodness Bain acted in time cancelled the shares and fired those thieves from the Board.

Maybe that is why this deal will finally go through. Boards are supposed to represent us the shareholders not steal stock. We want to get some value out of this stock already and a reverse merger is the way to go

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.