InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 119
Posts 1758
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/03/2006

Re: None

Thursday, 10/11/2007 8:41:20 PM

Thursday, October 11, 2007 8:41:20 PM

Post# of 131532
1. Among many previous points made by myself and others in the past were:

(a) Promises of transparency
(b) Promises of conservative share structure management
(c) Products promised
(b) Features promised

2. Among those points it was made clear shareholders had to demand transparency.

3. When you got only partial disclosure recently, but not the mechanisms for full verification that presented

A NEW ISSUE of:

4. Full Verification is Transparency, not partial disclosure without a third party transfer agent.

5. Which leads to WHAT's NEW? Well the fact insiders claim to hold shares now, but you can't verify it. THIS IS A NEW ISSUE that arose with the recent unverifiable disclosures made by the company.

The fact is previous issues raised by skeptics were proven to be fully justified. Not only was the OS diluted heavily, but it was maxed out even beyond most skeptic's guesstimates. The severity of the dilution still leaves new unanswered questions, one of which I clarified today and which IS NOT REDUNDANT, which is:

WHAT IS THE VERIFIABLE FLOAT?

Without that information, this has no odds attached to it even as a risky gamble.

This is a new factor that was not well addressed before.