But lowman, you just said in the previous post:
"I'm seeing your point, and the unlikeliness of such a consistency. Perhaps Buyins is not all they appear to be, and I can agree that Don should be made aware of this, and possibly even seek a refund on monies paid, not to mention maybe even damages suffered, if any can be proved."
In this post you agree with airdale1 and say, "suspicion is totally unfounded".
Which is it?
The company shows great promise and ethics and when someone like me finds an inconsistent behavior in only one tiny piece of the picture, shouldn't it be dealt with? If I walk around with my fly open I would hope someone would tell me (assuming the breeze doesn't give me the alert...) so I can fix it. That is all I am trying to do.
