InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 111
Posts 10103
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/23/2006

Re: None

Monday, 10/08/2007 8:08:42 PM

Monday, October 08, 2007 8:08:42 PM

Post# of 143047
All are questions, sent separately, I have asked the company with no response. Instead they answer where to find Ihub????

So, I sent this;
I thought the forum was for answering questions about the company. I have questions about the company that have gone unanswered for weeks and yet you post this! I get replies like, do to heavy emails it will take 3-4 days, and still no response. I even have had questions deleted from you comment page. How about answering some of the questions a shareholder with over 125ml shares would like to know. For my questions look under your comment page.
Thankyou

And guess what, Auto reply, no answer. If anyone else would like to try I’d appreciated.


Sent 10-04-07
I think that is great news that Garr will be here next year to continue to run the company.
Some concerns after reading these post need answered.
1. I thought the preferred shares were only 2000, obviously Gar can not live off of a portion of these. So how many shares do Minaco-TradeX own and how/when did this happen?
2. It was stated these shares are the same as our common shares only with 30,000: 1 voting rights. Again how can he live off that?
3. Still concerned about losing my share count after the O/S has double since buying our shares, giving us ½ the percentage to O/S I had before.

Sent 10-04-07
On April 17th, 2007, the Company issued 2,000 preferred shares with 20,000 - 30,000:1 (depending on where you read it) super voting rights to Minaco-TradeX
Corp. These preferred shares were issued in conjunction with a secured line of credits for up to $600,000, secured by a
GSA on Company assets.
Are these the shares that Garr is getting? It was stated in a post here that these shares are the same as all the other shares with the exception of the voting (these are worth 20,000:1)
Many shareholders are still worry that shares will be reduced by a R/S or R/M, this should not happen. We purchase shares at prices far above what the PPS are now, while all the time the company has add shares to the O/S. Now the O/S is twice what it was when we bought there for our percent of over all shares has been cut in half.
What Garr has done is very commendable, now the company needs to buy back more shares to reduce the O/S, giving the value back to the shareholders that have stood by them through it all.
Once again to reduce the number of shares the shareholders have would be a very sad and underhanded thing to do to the people that gave you the money to advance this company.

Sent 9-28-07
On Sept. 12, I seen where XXXX.pk has been running an investor awareness campaign for the last couple weeks, which includes a full page ad in the USA Today daily paper. Their stock has went from approx. $1.25 to $2.75. This has obviously work for them.
Is this the kind of full out exposure you are going to do? And when will this campaign start.




Famous Quotes:

"Patience is a virtue, so I am told, of course I haven’t any."

"If they make me rich, all is forgiven"

~Me~



Disclaimer; My posts are for entertainment only.