SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[Ineedmoreshares]

This is my only problem with the SWARM/141 deal.

"141 will handle all aspects of SWARM...

This could include sub-licensing."

SPZI is in the business of selling advanced platform software.
141 is in the business of trading capital.

If the argument for using 141 to trade is that SPZI would have a conflict of interest, then I'm totally down with that and I understand it and I understand why SPZI would only get various percentages of profits and shares of 141.

But if there is to be any sub-licensing of SWARM, it's SPZI who should be doing that and getting 100% of the proceeds. Otherwise, the so called license to 141 from SPZI is not a license at all but a "sale" of intellectual property which SPZI had previously owned 100%.

I will send Paul an email about this and ask for clarification.