InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 33
Posts 7053
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/04/2003

Re: matt25 post# 3545

Tuesday, 10/02/2007 7:53:15 PM

Tuesday, October 02, 2007 7:53:15 PM

Post# of 5140
I misunderstood.

Well, I'll leave armp to explain why he interjected. To me, it is clear that Snackman has a curious philosophy. I'd bridle against it if I spent any time there. I choose not to.

But I didn't see any sign armp was expressing a dreary view similar to those of unclevername and numerous others who seem only to see the same grey landscape they saw a time and times and half a time back. For those people, only the income statement can provide a cure.

Personally, I find the cautious-pessimistic part of the spectrum utterly incredible at this point: from an operational perspective, the negatives seem to be mostly poor understanding, pushmepullyou projection and blunt analytical tools. The evidence for hope is absolutely screaming. Just as the evidence of the early stage failure of standalone ETS also seemed very clear long before the hopers could see what was happening.

The point isn't to be continuously negative or continuously positive. It's to know that the wind has changed direction.

So for me, the only sensible people are the super-positive ones at this moment. But I wouldn't deny the pessimists their opportunity to groan!!!

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.