Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:38:19 PM
Did I say this year? next year? If SWARM does turn into a hedge fund in 141, with only an estimated 180 million shares in the float, do you not think that $5 a share isn't even close? The numbers we currently have for SWARM were indeed from a beta but should we use a much smaller percentage number because we don't 'think' it will do that well, or do we use a number closer to what they actually posted? Sounds like a big assumption to think a smaller percentage one is correct over a larger one. We can only go on what has been given to us and given those numbers, there should be HUGE amounts of money flowing into 141's SWARM fund. And do you not think then that the share price will reflect that? Again, this is based on some of the numbers we already have as well as some best guessimates on share structure for 141.
The 7% is a bonus and a part of the management fee for a SWARM fund. That's all I see of it.
AIMO
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM