InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 289
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/15/2006

Re: Jenny_Garner post# 31280

Tuesday, 10/02/2007 5:38:19 PM

Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:38:19 PM

Post# of 86716
Jenny, Where did I put a time frame on the $5 projection?

Did I say this year? next year? If SWARM does turn into a hedge fund in 141, with only an estimated 180 million shares in the float, do you not think that $5 a share isn't even close? The numbers we currently have for SWARM were indeed from a beta but should we use a much smaller percentage number because we don't 'think' it will do that well, or do we use a number closer to what they actually posted? Sounds like a big assumption to think a smaller percentage one is correct over a larger one. We can only go on what has been given to us and given those numbers, there should be HUGE amounts of money flowing into 141's SWARM fund. And do you not think then that the share price will reflect that? Again, this is based on some of the numbers we already have as well as some best guessimates on share structure for 141.

The 7% is a bonus and a part of the management fee for a SWARM fund. That's all I see of it.


AIMO


ITGuy

"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."