InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 289
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/15/2006

Re: snow post# 31263

Tuesday, 10/02/2007 3:23:29 PM

Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:23:29 PM

Post# of 87169
Snow, you are correct in your assumptions.

I assume that they already have had their private placement of initial capital - hence how could they have started trading already. The initial capital is a small amount - maybe a million or so. This is only so SWARM can prove it's track record before going to the Expo to seek large public money - money that will go into a fund vs being privately placed as ownership in the company.

I agree that if SPZI has a 40% stake in 141 and then that gets diluted in order to raise more starting capital - that would be a bad thing. But I certainly see nothing that would lead me to believe that. I think that would hurt Paul's stake in the company even more than ours.

As far as the profits from the fund, don't all funds have some sort of management fee? I thought I read on the board at some point the a typical management fee for a hedge fund might be 20-30%. So if that is the case, 7% stated in the PR would go back to SPZI while the rest would pay 141 for the management.

AIMO

ITGuy

"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."