InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 6106
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2006

Re: ITGuy post# 31105

Monday, 10/01/2007 6:27:22 PM

Monday, October 01, 2007 6:27:22 PM

Post# of 87771
Very nice ITGUY,

Sounds like a gift to me;

"According to Paul, the license is perpetual and exclusive to 141 for the Futures and Derivatives market. Unless Paul clarifies otherwise, I can see why some might say this is a 'selling' of SWARM Futures and Div market vs a license. However, even if it was a 'sell', can't everyone see where the benefits of having this in one company - which Spooz will own a significant amount - benefits Spooz shareholders immensely? Spooz could either get license fees (and maybe partial profits) from multiple companies for the Futures and Divs SWARM license OR REQUIRE that all money that anyone wants to invest in SWARM Futures and Divs actually has to go through 141. Going through 141 and sending that stock soaring could in turn give a far greater benefit to us shareholders than from licensing alone since we own a 'significant' amount of 141. All this doesn't preclude the fact that the selling of the equity licenses can't happen. So we could get the best of both worlds - a license fee from multiple companies for equity trading and a increasing rate of return from the Futures and Div license to 141."

"What we see depends mainly on what we look for" John Lubbock

My statements are my opinion only. Good luck!