Just when I thought I was out...
have to defend my DD. need the last word.
"A sale is much different than a perpetual license."
Only if the license is not exclusive. If the license is exclusive and perpetual the difference is in name only not effect.
"SPOOZ owns the IP associated with SWARM. Period."
Big deal. if the license bars them from leasing it to other parties, this means jack crap. It's the person who controls the intellectual property that "effectively" owns it.
"141 gets to use SWARM as long as they uphold the agreements in the licensing contract."
Since 141 and SPZI are the same people, I don't see how not upholding the contract is a possibility. What will SPZI do if 141 doesn't uphold the contract? Will Paul go sue himself in court?
Listen people, I have made a valid point here, a point which is in the best interest of SPZI shareholders to have clarified by Paul.
I want to leave this now. But if you want me to stay here and bash my point home, I will and it will not be good for PPS because I know the law and I can articulate the law.
Let's see a little PR love from Paul to the shareholders with some clarity as to what the deal is.
He's left this open for bashers to have a field day and that's what is going on.
Jenny, Snow and Verapan are all the same people as far as I can tell. Their handwriting and arguments and even the manner in which they graphically structure paragraphs are the same. Furthermore, all three are involved posting exclusively at the same two boards where they hold the same exact positions. Look at their posting history for confirmation.
The MOds here should have Shelley or Matt (IHUB MOds) check their IPs to see if that proves my point.
The Mods here need to be more vigilant about weeding out this behavior. Have a little courage that what you are seeing is truly what you think it is.
