SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[ThSeeker]

Snow I tend to agree with you on this. I see no harm in someone looking at the actions of management and if they disagree or dislike an action taken to express those feelings.
Taking an objective look and commenting seems fair game to me.
To do so in a negative fashion is only being honest.

That said you seemed to have looked at what Paul did with SWARM and don't like or understand it. And will NOT except Paul explanation of why he did it. The whole key to his action is simply this. He said trading in house with SWARM was not acceptable. He could and would not do it. Now if you do not accept that then so be it.

We have accepted this and therefore see the alternative Paul has chosen to be very attractive for spooz stockholders. Paul found away for SWARM to be used and still provide significant profit to us. And still has the door open to strike deals for SWARM usage in areas other than futures and derivatives.

I must assume you don't like this deal because you feel Spooz can trade with SWARM and still execute their plans to market
their other tools without a conflict of interest. Maybe that is where you need to make your case. Prove him wrong on this. Then you will have a leg to stand on in your opinion that Paul handled this deal badly and not in the best interest of Spooz shareholders.