InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 66
Posts 1920
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/14/2001

Re: Guy post# 82492

Sunday, 09/30/2007 8:55:38 PM

Sunday, September 30, 2007 8:55:38 PM

Post# of 173778
No, I still disagree as your view of the numbers doesn't factor any of the growth looking forward. Back to the trailing though - numbers are numbers - trailing PE is what the company has done in the PAST on paper - its right there in black & white in the filings - for 2007, they did 0.62EPS (0.51 through actual operations). That is just one gauge of value. The other obviously is forward PE (no earnings have happened yet at 18m O/S). The way I see that, yes, shares now are at 18 million, but also look at the growth. NET $$$ grew 170% from 2005 to 2006 and then 70% from 2006-2007. Even taking it a notch lower - if you drop that to 50% to 2008 on TRUE earnings of 5.8m, thats 8.7m net next year, or 0.46 on 18m shares - thats still ONLY 7.6PE. Hell, add another 12m O/S over a year - 30m o/s, and thats STILL forward PE of only 12.

So i've taken what I'd say is the worst case scenario, and we still have FROM OPERATIONS, a trailing PE of 6.7m and a forward PE of 12. This is a $7-10 stock easy, and thats the bottom line, regardless how we look at past numbers and todays.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.